Showing posts with label constant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constant. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2016

[AM_20161105ITFF] False Friends in Integration (Calculus)

Question

Introduction
          False friends are words in two languages that look/sound alike, but differ significantly in meaning.  Do you know that there are also false friends in mathematics?  Can you distinguish and explain the difference between the two integrals?

Solution

          The integrand on the left has the variable  x  as the base and the constant  e  as the index.  So we integrate it using the Power Law.
          By contrast, for the integrand on the right, the base  e  is a constant whereas the index is the variable  x.  Integrating  e  to the power of  x  is the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeasiest.  You just get back the same thing, plus the arbitrary constant of course.

Remark
          Many students make the mistake of trying to apply the Power Law for the exponential.  As a learner of mathematics, one needs to cultivate the habit of being observant and paying attention to detail.  This is part of developing one’s identity and character which is important in life.

Suitable Levels
GCE ‘O’ Level Additional Mathematics
GCE ‘A’ Levels (revision)
* revision for IB Mathematics HL & SL (revision)
* Advanced Placement (AP) Calculus AB & BC
* University / College Calculus
* other syllabuses that involve integral calculus

* whoever is interested

Sunday, December 20, 2015

[AP_Calculus_IGSB] Integrating an Exponential with Square Root

Problem

Introduction
     Here is an integration problem that has no clues as to what to do with it.  Hmmm ... the integrand (3 to the power of square root something) does not look like it can be simplified.  [H09, H10]  How about a substitution?  [H12]  But what substitution?  Usually, we substitute the “ugliest” part of the integrand.  What constitutes the “ugliest” requires experience and observation.  In this case, the square root expression looks pretty nasty.  But how do we even integrate  3  to the power of something?

How to Integrate the Exponential


Solution

Comment
     In this problem, the original variable of integration is  x.  When doing substitutions, it is usually easier to make  x  the subject, and then replace the  “dx” with its equivalent.  After the substitution [H11], we integrate by parts and then substitute back to express everything in terms of  x.

H04. Look for pattern(s)        [look for the “ugliest” part]
H05. Work backwards
H09. Restate the problem in another way
H10. Simplify the problem
H11. Solve part of the problem
H12* Think of a related problem

Suitable Levels
GCE ‘A’ Levels H2 Mathematics (challenge)
* IB Mathematics HL (challenge)
* Advanced Placement (AP) Calculus AB & BC
* University / College calculus
* other syllabuses that involve integration
* any precocious or independent learner who is interested



Tuesday, June 9, 2015

[Pri20150402PTSMAP] A Staircase with Higher Steps

Question


Introduction
     This pertains to the sum of consecutive numbers with constant skips.  I set this question
to illustrate the heuristic of looking for patterns [H04].  It is similar to this question, except that now the numbers jump or skip by  2  instead of just   1.  The more knowledgeable reader will doubtless recognise this to be an arithmetic progression.  The challenge now is how can a primary school pupil do it without having learnt about any more advanced mathematics or algebra, relying purely on pattern recognition.

Solution
     As in the previous solution, imagine the sum as a series of vertical bars.  The numbers all jump by  2  this time.  Because the jump amount  2  is constant, you see a nice staircase pattern (shown in violet).  Each step of the staircase is of height  2  units.  If we make a copy of it and turn it upside-down (shown in green), the two staircases join together nicely to form a rectangle.  Notice that  101+3 = 99+5 = 97+7 = ... etc and they are all equal to  104.  If we know the number of columns, we can work out our desired sum.  How many columns are there?

     The number of columns is the same as the number of terms in  our sum.  OK, but then how many terms are there?  How to calculate this?  Let us look at a few simple cases first [H10. Simplify the problem].
Let us try to observe the pattern.  Note that the size of each skip is always  2.  If there are  2  terms, it is just  3  and  5,  there is one skip of  2.  From  3  to  7,  there are  3  terms, there are two skips of  2  each.  From  3  to  9,  there are  4  terms,  the difference is  6  and there are  3  skips.  From  3  to  11,  there are  5  terms,  the difference is  8  and there are  4  skips.  If you go from  3  to  13,  the net jump is  10  and there are  5  skips  and  6  terms.  We can tabulate the data into a table [H02] below:-

        skip size = 2
Start
End
Total Skip
# skips
# terms
3
5
5 – 3 = 2
2 ¸ 2 = 1
2
3
7
7 – 3 = 4
4 ¸ 2 = 2
3
3
9
9 – 3 = 6
6 ¸ 2 = 3
4
3
11
11 – 3 = 8
8 ¸ 2 = 4
5
3
13
13 – 3 = 10
10 ¸ 2 = 5
6
Do you notice some things?  [H04]

The total skip is the difference between the starting and ending numbers.

The number of skips is the difference divided by the skip size.

The number of terms is always one more than the number of skips.

Since our last term is  103,  the total skip is  101 – 3 = 98.  The number of skips is  98 ¸ 2 = 49.   So there are  50 terms  i.e.  50  columns.

Hence the size of our rectangle is  50 × 104.  But we only want half of this rectangle (shown in violet).   Hence the sum is  ½ × 50 × 104 = 2 600.

Ans:   3 + 5 + 7 + ... + 99 + 101 = 2 600

Summary
     This article illustrates the heuristic [H04 Look for pattern(s)].  Our first pattern we notice is the staircase pattern.  After making a copy and turning that around, we notice that it forms a rectangle, with columns of size  104  each.  Now we look for a pattern that enables us to find the number of columns, which is the number of terms in our sum.  We note that the number of terms is always the same as the number of skips, which is the same as the difference between the start and the end all divided by the skip size.  This enables us to solve the challenge in a way similar to my previous example.

Reflections
     Do you think this method will work for different starting numbers and different ending numbers?  For different skip sizes?  Why not set up your own similar question and try it yourself and see whether it works?


H02. Use a diagram / model
H04. Look for pattern(s)
H09. Restate the problem in another way
H10. Simplify the problem

Suitable Levels
Primary School Mathematics
GCE ‘O’ Level “Elementary” Mathematics (Number patterns, with algebra)
GCE ‘A’ Levels H2 Mathematics (sequences and series, with algebra)
IB Mathematics (sequences and series, with algebra)
* anyone who loves patterns and relishes a challenge






Sunday, March 8, 2015

[Pri20150306COH] The Cards of Hearts?


Question

Introduction

     For this question, I shall illustrate my technique of Distinguished Ratio Units to model the situation.  Read the question carefully and translate the information into a diagram [ using heuristic H02 ] like below:-




     I used three different shapes (circle, triangle and square) to envelop the numerical counts of the different kinds ratio units. Although we do not know how many circle units’ worth of cards Kelly had at first, we quickly notice that  9 circle units are equivalent to 3 triangle units, so that one triangle unit is the same as 3 circle units.  So Kelly had 2 circle units’ worth of cards [ heuristic H05 ], as depicted below:-

 
This allows us to answer part (a) of the question already, namely that the required ratio is 10 : 2 i.e. 5 : 1.  With different types of units, it is difficult to compare things.  However, note that in the exchange of cards, the total number of cards remains constant.  Taking the LCM of 12, 4 and 11 which is 132, we can change all the ratio units to a common type of unit [ H09], say ‘heart’ unit, based on the total being 132 ‘heart’ units.  To do that, we can multiply the numerical counts in columns 1 & 2 by 11, multiply column 3 by 33 and multiply column 4 by 12.  This is what we would get:-

     To answer part (b) of the question, we actually do not need to bother about columns 2 and 3.  Just focus on columns 1 and 4.  From column 4 we observe that 84 minus 48 which is 36 ‘heart’ units gives 72, so one ‘heart’ unit corresponds to 2.  The number of cards won by Kelly can be found by comparing the 84 ‘heart’ units and 22 ‘heart’ units highlighted in yellow.


  That means 62 ‘heart’ units and that corresponds to 134.  And we are done!

Answer (a)   5 : 1
              (b)   134


H02. Use a diagram / model
H05. Work backwards
H09. Restate the problem in another way

Thinking Back

     In this question, we have used Distinguished Ratio Units to model the given situation.  We worked backwards to find that Kelly’s initial holdings were worth 2 circle units.  Then we converted everything to a common unit (‘heart’ unit) based on the constant total of 132 heart units.  Once again, I © hearts!

Friday, March 6, 2015

[Pri20150306RCU] A Very Crowded Class

Question


Solution

     Let us write down the given information in a Ratio diagram.


     As you can see, we have ratios with different units, which seems difficult to solve.  However, notice that the number of boys stayed the same throughout.  We know that the LCM of 6 and 7 is 42.  So let us use another type of unit, say “heart” units, with the number of boys corresponding to 42 of these units.  This can be done by multiplying the first column by 7 and multiplying the second column by 6.  This is what we get


     With the “heart” units, now it is very obvious that one “heart” is equivalent to 2.  From here we easily deduce that the number of boys is 84.

Commentary

     This is a type of “problem” where one quantity (the number of boys) is kept constant while another (the number of girls) changes, giving rise to different ratios.  It is similar to the "Boys, Girls and Party" problem, and you can certainly solve this problem using the bridging method shown there.  However, here we exploit the fact that the number of boys stayed the same, and we use the LCM to create a common type of unit (“heart” unit).  Once this is done, we can easily compare the number of girls using this common unit, and then the problem unravels.  Don’t you © hearts?

     Anyway, talking about authenticity in mathematics problems ... the number of boys is already 84, if you work out the total i.e. including the girls, you get ... (Do This Yourself).  Won’t you find this class a little too crowded?

     The person who set this question should probably have moved the pupils to the auditorium, yes?