[Maths Education] Mathematical Journalling

     Nowadays, I see some schools / textbooks asking students to search the internet and to write on a certain problem on their “mathematics journal”.  It's so very guided.  It's so artificial.  The questions should come from the learners themselves, out of their own curiosity.  The learn then seeks to answer their own questions.  The journal can serve as to document and summarise their process of learning.

     The best maths journals are self-initiated.  Great mathematician Karl Friedrich Gauss and renowned scientist Richard Feynman kept math journals on their own accord, not because some teacher told them to do it. 

     When I was a student, I borrowed books from the National Library on things out of the normal curriculum.  I kept notes of things I learned.  I also did my own investigations.  I accidently discovered quadratic equations when I was in Primary 4.  I read guidebooks, asked my friend's elder brothers and sisters, my Chinese teacher (!) and other people to find out more.  I did not like factorisation by trial-and-error.  Neither did I like completing the square nor using the quadratic formula.  So I did my own research to find a sure-fire way to factorise without trial-and-error.  I finally managed to find a way, but my method had an uncanny similarity to the quadratic formula.  It was a Pyrrhic victory, but it was fun!  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

     If students need to be told or goaded to write mathematics journals, then we as educators need to ask ourselves:  Why?  What is their conception of mathematics and education?  What experiences have they gone through that lead them to these beliefs?

     Some food for thought, eh?

[S2_20151226EFQF] Factorisation without Trial and Error?

Problem

 

Introduction

     This problem was posed by a student going on to Secondary 1 (~ grade 7) next year.  This sort of problem is usually done at Secondary 2 or 3 (about grade 8 or 9).  This reminds me of my personal story.

     I accidentally discovered quadratic equations when I was in Primary 4.  I imagined a rectangle whose length is  2 cm  longer than the breadth.  If the breadth is  4 cm, the length is  6 cm and the area is obviously  24 cm².  But if I pretended that I knew the area but did not know the dimensions, I did not know how to solve it with the knowledge that I had at that time.  This started me on a quest to find out the answer.  I read secondary school guidebooks, asked my friend’s brothers and sisters, and even asked my Chinese teacher (who, after exams, offered to answer any question we had)!  Basically, I was offered two choices: (1) trial and error factorisation  and  (2) the quadratic formula.  I did not like guess and check (or hit and run?), and the quadratic formula looked formidable to me.

     So I started a quest to find a method of factorisation that did not require trial-and-error.  By secondary 1, after fiddling around with algebra, I managed to do it.  I reconstruct my derivation below.  And then I use my method to solve the above factorisation problem.

Derivation

Solution

Remark

     This looks like a Pyrrhic victory.  But like they say, it’s the journey and not the destination that matters.  Doing my own explorations prepared me for future learning and made me understand better.

     Nowadays, the new models of calculators give solutions to the associated equations and you can work backwards to get the factorisation.  Unfortunately, many students just blindly use this and forget to work backwards, giving the wrong factorisation.  If calculator gives 9 and ^-248/₂₉, and you write your factorisation as (x – 9)(x + ²⁴⁸/₂₉), your answer is wrong. Moral of the story: you still need to use your brain.

[Education] Unto much is given …

Article

Unto much is given …

Please read my article from my education blog.  Get inspired !