Monday, March 16, 2015

[#Critique] Did #Seth #Godin know what #transcendental means in #maths?

Article
Magic and irrational (by Seth Godin)


My Comments

This is an interesting piece of inspirational waffle about p to celebrate "p day".  Hopefully this special day helps to keep this important piece of knowledge that has a long cultural history fresh in our collective human consciousness, and perhaps stem the decline in mathematical literacy of some of us.

However, his article made me wonder whether he knew what transcendental means.  It is a pretty technical concept, and even if one knew what it means, it's a challenge to put it in layman's terms and say something funny with it.  If he knew the meaning, he certainly did not show it.

But I do not blame him.  Seth Godin is known for his marketing, not for his maths.  So this is not a personal attack.  I'm just following his advice, trying to be a purple cow.  Perhaps after some "moo moo" here and "moo moo" there, and transcendental meditation, this zero of a cow could break off from its roots of limited degree, eat the pi in the sky and jump over the Mooooooooon to become a hero!

;-)

[#Critique] Is #pi #infinite?

Article / Resource
The infinite life of pi - Reynaldo Lopes



My Comments
This is a well-produced video in which the team took great care in producing an interesting narrative.  The circles were drawn imperfect and shaky, so as to catch the attention of viewers and to highlight them.  A couple of points they missed out:-

1) p being irrational, does not only have an infinite number of digits in its decimal expansion, the digits are also non-repeating.  A rational number (fraction) like 1/7 also has an infinite number of digits, but they repeat: 1/7 = 0.142857 142857 142857 ...

2) near the end of the video, the animators depicted universe < p.  I find the artistic licence disturbing.  I am sure there is some way to artistically depict the known universe having less number of atoms than number of digits of p.

To answer the question in the title of this article "Is p infinite?": No, but her number of decimal digits is.

[Technology] #Calculator that makes you #Think

Article / Resource
QAMA Calculator Examples

My Comments
This calculator aims to enforce human estimation, and cultivate number-sense.  More designers / manufacturers / inventors should do likewise by at least trying to make students think.

Monday, March 9, 2015

[IB-HL H&H_Rev6C Q11] Factors of a Complex Polynomial

Question

Introduction
     This question is taken from the Haese & Harris textbook for IB HL Mathematics and is rather challenging.  Here I present two solutions.  In the first solution, I use substitution to make a variable “disappear”.  [ heuristics: H10. Simplify the problem, H11. Solve part of the problem]  And that allowed me to crack the rest of them problem.  In the second solution, I rephrased the problem in terms of tangents to curves. [ heuristic H09. Restate the problem in another way ] This gives another angle from which to tackle the problem.

Solution 1


Solution 2


Thinking Back
     Both solutions are related in the sense that they hinge on some form of the relation maked as [*].  That led to an equation in  a.  Once a  is found,  k  can be found, and the solutions proceed similarly.  The equation [*] is a manifestation of the fact that for a repeated root, both P(x) and P’(x) share a common factor.

[Pri20150308CSR] Charitable Savings Ratios?

Question

Introduction
     Here is another one of those Singapore Mathematics problems that are two-variable simultaneous equations in disguise.  The key to solving this question quickly is to exploit the fact that the amount of donations are the same in this case.

Solution
     First, read the question and translate the information into a diagram [H02. Use a diagram / model].  I use different shapes (e.g. circle and square) to envelop the different types of units.

     Since we have ‘-80’  for both Sharon and Ryan [H04. Look for pattern(s)], we may deduce that 1 ‘circle’ unit  (5 minus 4 ‘circle’ units) is equal to 3 ‘square’ units (10 minus 7 ‘square’ units).  That means 5 ‘circle’ units is 15 ‘square units’.  [ H10. Simplify the problem]

     By comparison again, we realise that 5 square units is 80 [H05. Work backwards] and hence 15 ‘square’ units is 240.

Ans: Sharon’s savings was $240 at first.

Check
Before    $240   $192      5 : 4
After      $160   $112     10 : 7

Solution makes sense.

H02. Use a diagram / model
H04. Look for pattern(s)
H05. Work backwards
H10. Simplify the problem

Sunday, March 8, 2015

[Pri20150306APC] Apples-with-Pears Comparison

Question

Introduction
     This question involves money and looks rather challenging, because there are a few unknown quantities.  To solve it, we use the concept of unit costs, so that we can make an “apples-to-apples” ... er ... I mean “pears-to-apples” J comparison of the prices.

Solution
     Since absolute dollar amounts are given, we can quickly solve [H11. Solve part of the problem] for the total costs of pears and apples as follows [H02. Use a diagram / model]:-

     Now we know that the total cost (in dollars) of pears is 45 and for the apples it is 50 (5 more than 45).  Although we do not know the absolute numbers of pears and apples, we know their ratio.  So let us write these down as, say, ‘square’ units. 


     Dividing the total costs by the numbers gives the unit costs, which we know only in ratio terms.  So let us use, say, ‘circle’ units to denote these.  But we know that the unit cost (in $) of an apple is 0.50 less than that of a pear.  And that is equivalent to 5 ‘circle’ units.  From here [H05. Work backwards], we quickly work out the cost of a pear (15 ‘circle’ units) as $1.50.

     Ta da!

H02. Use a diagram / model
H05. Work backwards
H11. Solve part of the problem