Question
Introduction
This puzzle is making its rounds on the Internet. The “solution” is easy enough.
3 ×
6 = 18
4 ×
8 = 32
5 × 10 = 50
6 × 12 = 72
7 × 14 = 98
Notice that the numbers in the second column is
always twice the corresponding number in the first column. For the number 10, we have
10 × 20 = 200
Critique 1
A few people might get tricked by taking 10 × 16 =
160, since 16 is the next even number
after 14. But that is not my gripe. My issue is with the abuse of the “=”
sign. This sign stands for “equal” which
means, equal (Surprise! Surprise!). Equal means the same, having the same
value. 3
is not equal to 18. So we should not write “3 = 18”, because that
is not true. Writing “3 × 6 = 18” is OK and correct, because it makes
sense and it is a true statement. Mathematics is not
a jumble of nonsensical symbols, although to
some people it seems like it. The symbols have meanings. And these symbols
should not be abused. If you want to say
“corresponds to”, then you might want
to use an arrow e.g. “3 ¾® 18”. This is
keeping with the modern concept of a function,
in which a value is assigned unambiguously to another number. Using a function notation we can write things like “f(3) = 18”.
Critique 2
Another problem with puzzles such as this is that, using Lagrange Interpolation
or Newton Interpolation and the like, it is always possible to invent a function that
hits the given first few numbers and then any number you like (even a “wrong”
number). For the above puzzle, the
Lagrange method allows us to cook up a function like this:-
This
function looks complicated, but if you note carefully, when you substitute the
numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10, one of the algebraic fractions with x becomes equal to 1 and
the rest of them become 0. Thus, we easily see that f(3) = 18,
f(4) = 32, f(5) = 50, f(6) = 72
and f(7) = 98. For
f(10), I could actually have
chosen any value I like, but I chose the number 42. So the correct answer does not have to be
200. There is actually no single correct
answer, since you can make it any
answer you like! This trick can be done
on all similar puzzles, and hence these “IQ” puzzles have now been effectively debunked!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.