Showing posts with label functions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label functions. Show all posts

Sunday, March 29, 2015

[AJC Promo 2012 Q5] Range of Composite Functions with Inverse

Diagram 1.  Whole Question

     This is a question taken from Anderson Junior College, one of Singapore’s above-average junior colleges (in terms of the calibre of student intake).  By now this college is reputed to set the most difficult examination questions in Singapore.  It seems that they are trying to give the top junior colleges a run for their money, so to speak.  The question is difficult because it really tests students’ understanding of the concepts.  If you do not understand what is happening, you would be totally lost – even your graphing calculator (GC), the student’s favorite psychological crutch, would not be of much help.
Diagram 2.  Part (i) of Question

     Part (i) of the question tests students’ understanding of 1-to-1 functions (a.k.a. one-one functions or injective functions).  A function is invertible if and only if the function is one-one.  [ For the current A level H2 syllabus, it is assumed that the codomain is always the same as the range, so there is no need to worry about survjectivity. ]  Using the GC to graph the function  f   and to obtain the local maximum point, one sees that the required domain is  -2 < x < 0.  
Ans:  k = -2.   [ I am using black for explanations and blue for written answers. ]
     The domain is highlighted in yellow in the diagram below.  If the yellow region were to extend to the left beyond this point, it would be possible for a horizontal line to cross two points in the yellow region.  That would make the function  f  not 1-to-1 and hence not invertible.
Diagram 3.  Graph of f

Diagram 4.  Part (ii) of Question

For part (ii), we recall that a composite function exists if and only if the range of the first function (read from right to left) is a subset of the domain of the second function.
We require
Range of g  Í  Domain of f-1
The domain of  f-1  (the second function) is actually the range of  f.  From the above diagram, the relevant part of  f(x)  goes from -¥  to  f(-2) = -2 + ln 4 = 2 ln 2 – 2 » -0.614.  The range of  g is everything from -1 downwards (see diagram below: imagine taking every possible point of  R, the domain of g on the x-axis and shooting them over to the y-axis).  We write
            Range of g     = (-¥, -1]
            Domain of f-1 = (-
¥, 2 ln 2 – 2]
Since Range of g Í Domain of f-1,  therefore  f-1g  exists.

Diagram 5.  Range of g

     Finding the range of composite functions is something that many students have difficulty with.  There are two methods: the direct method and the two-step method.  The direct method is usually difficult or infeasible.  In this case, finding range from the graph of  y = f-1g(x) is practically impossible, because there is no simple formula for  f-1.   
The two-step method:
Step 1.  Find the range of the first function.
Step 2.  Transfer this range to the x-axis of the graph of the second
             function and map every point therein over to the y-axis.

     Step 1 has been done already.  We have found that  Range of g = (-¥, -1] . 
Diagram 6.  The Two-step Method

     For step 2, although the formula for  f-1  is impossible to find (it’s a pretty nasty question, isn’t it?), we know that this graph is a reflection of the graph of  y = f(x)  (shown in blue on the diagram on the right) in the line  y = x, and we can sketch this (shown in red on the diagram on the right).  Now transfer the range of g from the y-axis of your first diagram over to the x-axis of this diagram on the right (shown in green).  Now imagine taking every possible point of this set and mapping it over to the y-axis of the second graph.  The problem is: how to find  f-1(-1)  when we don’t even know the formula for f-1?  (really evil problem, isn’t it?).  One way to deal with this is to make an educated guess for  f(what?) = -1. 
     Notice that f(-1) = -1.  Therefore  f-1(-1) = -1.
     What if your intuition really sucks and you cannot make a guess?  The GC can come to your rescue.  Set up the graph of  y = f(x)  with the restricted domain and then intersect that with the graph of  y = -1.  The intesection is at  x = -1,  which means f(-1) = -1,  or  f-1(-1) = -1,  as above.
Diagram 7.  Using Intersection on the GC

     Going back to diagram 6: From the range of g on the x-axis of the graph on the right, the points will land on every point from 0 down to f-1(-1) = -1, including -1 but excluding 0 (because x-axis is an asymptote for  y = f-1(x)).  We answer thus:-
     Range of  f-1g = [-1, 0)
Diagram 8.  Part (iii) of Question

Part (iii) tests students understanding of increasing and decreasing functions.
f  is an increasing function means
     whenever   a > b,   f(a) > f(b)  
f  is an decreasing function means
     whenever   a > b,   f(a) < f(b)  
These are in fact the definitions of increasing and decreasing functions.  One can recognise an increasing function from its graph by the up slope (positive gradients) as you move from left to right.  For a decreasing function, the slope will be down as you move from left to right (negative gradients).  [An interesting note:  if  f  is a decreasing function,  then  f-1  will also be a decreasing function.]
   In our case,  the graph of  f  is down-sloping, so it is a decreasing function. 
          Since  f  is a decreasing function,  whenever   a > b,   f(a) < f(b).
Once again we seem to have the pernicious problem of not knowing formula for  f-1.  How to solve the inequality then?  Well, we can apply  f  to both sides of the inequality and the inequality reverses (because f is a decreasing function).  Note that  f  and  f-1  “cancel”  as functions  i.e.  ff-1(w) = w  for whatever the  w  is as long as it is well-defined.  Hence we proceed as follows
                                          f-1g(x) > -1
                                        ff-1g(x) < f(-1)
                                              g(x) < -1
                                          -1 - x2 < -1
                                               - x2 < 0
This latter inequality is the last trick on the question-setter sleeve desgined to unsettle the student.  How do you solve this inequality?  Do you need to equate or intersect with anything?  Anyway, what is the meaning of solve?  
To solve an inequality means to find all the possible values of  x  such that when you substitute each value into the inequality, the inequality becomes a true statement.
Note here that if we substituted  x = 0,  we would get  0 < 0, which is not true.  However, if we substituted any other real number,  x2  would always be a positive number, the LHS would always be a negative number, which is less than zero.  Conclusion:  x  can be any real number except 0.
Ans:  x Î R \ {0}

Note that the written solution (the parts typed in blue) is actually very short, although the explanation is rather long, because a lot of deep thinking is involved.


Reflection
Let us think back on the lessons learnt while solving this particularly difficult problem.
*  the reason why this problem seems difficult is because it tests students’ understanding of
    concepts (which most are weak in).  From experience with many cohorts of students, the
    JC teachers know what concepts students are weak in and they like to set questions that
    exploit the chinks in students armours.
*  remember the horizontal line test and domain restriction to get a 1-to-1 function, so that the
    function is invertible.
*  remember the condition for the existence of composite functions
*  inverse functions swap the domain and range with the original functions
*  the two-step method is recommended for finding range of composite functions
*  increasing functions preserve inequalities, while decreasing functions reverse
    inequalities.  You can recognise a decreasing function from the downward
    slope of its graph as you go from left to right.
Although you do not have the formula for  f-1,
*  the value of  f-1(-1)  can be found by intersecting the graph of  y = f(x)  with the horizontal line
     y = -1.
*  f  and  f-1  “cancel” each other.
Finally,
*  what is the meaning of “solve an inequality”?
*  How to solve inequalities like  -x2 < 0?  What about  -x2 > 0?   x2 > 0?

Sunday, February 26, 2012

JCCDQBHWH_FN021(b) Range of Composite Functions

[original source unknown]



Introduction

     This question is from the usual book which did not credit the source.  It comes from some unknown junior college in an unknown year.  It is a challenging question because most students are poor at finding the range of composite functions.  Furthermore, this question has a little twist: you are given the range of the composite function, but you are required to solve for something.  So you need to, in a way, work backwards and/or use inequalities (another weak point for many students).

     Students are reminded of the right-to-left convention for functions in JC as well as GCE ‘A’ level examinations.  This means in ‘fg’ the  g  is done first before the  f.  There are some university professors who use a left-to-right convention, but here we do not.  So take note.

     Again metacogntion and heuristics are very important and I will illustrate their use.


Stage 1:  Understanding the Problem

What is this (part of a) question about?
range of composite functions, solving for unknown

What is given in the question?
The range of  fg.

What is the question asking for?
The value of  k  that leads to the given range.


Stage 2:  Planning the strategy

What heuristics do you think can be used for this question?
· Working forwards (considering the meanings, asking “so what?” “what next?”)
· Setting up equation/inequality
· Working/thinking backwards
· Consider equivalent expressions or rephrasing the problem

Can you recall the definition of the range of a function?  The range of a composite function?


Stage 3:  Execution

Any observations that can make your job simpler?
     Yes.  Observe that  g(x)  is a quadratic with positive  x2  coefficient.  So this is a parabola that looks like a happy smile.  To locate the minimum point, we can complete the square (a technique learnt in secondary school).
     g(x)  =  x2 + 2x – 1  =  x2 + 2x + 12 – 12 – 1  =  (x + 1) 2 – 2
when  x = -1,  g(x) = -2.  The minimum point is (-1,-2).  So the range of  g  is all the
numbers from  -2  upwards.  i.e.  Rg = [-2,` \oo `).

So what now?
     With the two-stage method, suppose now we have
                  x ` \in ` Rg
That means?
                  x > -2
That means?
                  x + k + 1 > -2 + k + 1
Why do you do that?
     I want to slowly manipulate the LHS to get  ln(x + k + 1)  which is  f(x).  Continuing,
                  ln(x + k + 1) > ln(k – 1)
                                f(x) > ln(k – 1)
i.e.                            Rfg = [ln(k – 1), ` \oo `).
Why is there no switching in the inequality sign?
     The slope of the graph of  the natural logarithm is always positive (albeit getting less steep for increasing  x).  So applying  ‘ln’  on both sides does not change the inequality.

What is the clue again?
     We are told that  Rfg = [ln 3, ` \oo `).  Aha!  *epiphany*  *light bulbs flashing*
ln(k – 1) must be equal to ln 3!!!  This can be solved easily!


figure 1 – working forward and backwards

Stage 4:  Evaluation

Is the answer correct?
     Substituting  k = 4,  we see that    ln(x + k + 1) =  ln(x + 5)  and with  x > -2,  this will be  > ln 3  as given in the clue.

And why  x > -2?
     This is because g(x) > -2, which we knew  from completing the square.  We treat the  ‘g(x)’  as the  ‘x’  when applying  f,  because this is what  fg(x)  really means.



Stage 5:  Reflection

What did we learn from solving this question?
     We used metacognition to do self-monitor and self-questioning during the 5 stage problem-solving process.
     We used the following heuristics.
· Working forwards (considering the meanings, asking “so what?” “what next?”)
· Setting up equation/inequality
· Working/thinking backwards
· Consider equivalent expressions or rephrasing the problem
     We learned to apply the definition of the range of fg.  There are two possible methods: the one-stage method and the two-stage method.  The latter is usually better.
     In the two-stage method, the range of  fg  is found by first finding the range of  g  and then applying the function  f  to it.  After the first step of finding the inequality for  g(x),  we can simply use  x  in the formula for  f.  How?  We set  x  to be in the range of  g(x) from the previous step,  then slowly manipulate the inequality until the expression for  f(x)  appears.  This will give us the range of  fg.
     From the formula for the range of  fg,  we learned how to make use of the given clue to work backwards to find the unknown k.
     Difficult questions can be tackled by thinking systematically and logically, and using heuristics and metacognition.  Mathematics is hard, but it is fun after you have learned it.  If you have really learned it, you become more powerful because you can use the same technique to solve all kinds of problems in future.

Any of your own reflections?  Please post in the comments below.

JCCDQBHWH_FN014(c) Condition for Composite Functions

[original source unknown]



Introduction

     This (part of a) question is taken from a certain book sold in Singapore which did not credit the original sources, so I do not know which junior college or which year it is taken from.   This is a common type of question regarding condition for the existence of composite functions, with a little twist.  Many students do not feel confident solving this kind of question, which tests one’s understanding of concepts besides algebraic manipulation.  I shall show you how.

     Note that composite functions are written with a right-to-left convention i.e. the function on the right comes first.  That means in the function  gf,  f  is applied first, then g.  This seems counter-intuitive.  Think of it like this:  gf(x)  means  g(f(x))  by definition.  Start with  x.  First we apply  f.  This  gives  f(x)  i.e.  f( )  wraps around the  x.  Next, we apply  g,  so we take g( )  and wrap it around  f(x)  to get  g(f(x)).  This is like putting on a shirt/blouse and then putting on a coat.


     As usual, metacogntion and heuristics are very important for solving this question.



Stage 1:  Understanding the Problem

What is this (part of a) question about?
Condition for existence composite functions, (domain) restriction of functions

What is the question asking?
Find the least value of  k  and the value of  a  so that the function  gf  exists.

Stage 2:  Planning the approach

Have you solved a similar problem before?  How was it solved last time?
Yes, it was solved by considering the condition for existence of  gf,  interpreting their meaning, and using appropriate inequalities.  Use the “thinking forward” heuristic: keep asking “what does this mean?”  and “So what? ”.

What is different this time?
There is an additional  “x  not equal to something”  type of condition.

Do you think the same tactic can work?
Maybe.  I can try.

Stage 3:  Executing the plan

What does it mean for the composite function  gf  to exist?
It means the range of  f  (the first function)  is contained in the domain of  g.
Write:  Rf ` \subseteq ` Dg.  Here  f  means the new  f  with the restricted domain.

So what does this mean?
It means  f(x)  is a member of  the domain of  g
Write:  f(x) ` \in ` (1, ` \oo `)\{2}.   [all the numbers bigger than one, except the number 2]

So what does this mean?
It means  f(x) > 1  and  f(x) ` != ` 2.
which means  x2 + 2x > 1  and  x2 + 2x ` != ` 2.



figure 1 – working forward

We continue the line of reasoning using the technique of competing the square for the ‘>’ and ‘` != `’ inequalities.  We need to be careful when taking square roots.  Fortunately, in this situation, we know that  x + 1 > 0,  since  x > -1  (x being in the domain of f).  So we only need to consider the positive square root.  We end up with
                     x > -1 + ` \sqrt(2) `   and                  x ` != ` -1 +  ` \sqrt(3) `

Obviously,  a = -1 +  ` \sqrt(3) `  (the value that  x  is not supposed to be equal to).
The statement     x > -1 + ` \sqrt(2) `  actually implies that a whole plethora of statements
                           x > k  with  k = -1 + ` \sqrt(2) ` = 0.4142…
                           x > k  with  k = 0.5
                           x > k  with  k = 0.6
                           x > k  with  k = 1.1
                           x > k  with  k = 999
                           x > k  with  k = 9 999
                           x > k  with  k = 99 999
                           x > k  with  k = 1 000 000 000
                           … etc.
can be true.  Among these the least possible  k  is -1 + ` \sqrt(2) ` (of course!!!).



Stage 4:  Evaluation

Is it possible to check your answer?  How?

     We can store  X2 + 2X  as a function.  For example, on the TI-84, we can store the formula into function variable Y1.  We can numerically evaluate  Y1(-1 + ` \sqrt(2) `) = 1  and  Y1(-1 + ` \sqrt(3) `) = 2.  We can verify numerically that, for example,  Y1(0.5),  Y1(0.6159),  Y1(1.3546) ,  Y1(99)  … etc gives values greater than 1  i.e. values in the domain of  g.  We check through the above steps to make sure every step is correct and makes sense.


Stage 5:  Reflection

What did you learn from solving this question?
     I learned to make use of the condition  Rf ` \subseteq ` Dg  for composite function.
     I learned to work forward  by systematically refining the above statement.
     I remembered the “completing the square” technique learned from secondary school.
     I remembered being careful when dealing with square roots in inequalities.
     I learned to check my work using the calculator.

Anything else you have learned from this question?  Post your comments below.