[OlymLSec_20160118PPPC] A Square Proof by Contradiction

Question

Explanation

     If  a + b = 11,  then  2ab = (a + b)² – (a² + b²) = 121 – 100 = 21.  But  2ab  is an even number, whereas  21  is odd.  This is a contradiction.  So (B) is impossible.  ©

Remarks

     Short and sweet isn’t it?  This uses the square-of-sum identity   (a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b².  I used the tactic of assuming the answer is correct  [H08]  and showing that this leads to something nonsensical [H05].  So the original assumption must be wrong.  This is called “proof by contradiction” or reductio ad absurdum (in Latin).

     By the way, the correct answer option is (E) from the Pythagorean Triplet   8² + 6² = 10²  with  {a, b} = {8, 6}.  The question seems to be taken from some Kangaroo mathematics competition.

Heuristics Used

H05. Work backwards

H08. Make suppositions

H09. Restate the problem in another way

H13* Use Equation / write a Mathematical Sentence

Suitable Levels

* Lower Secondary Mathematics competition

* GCE ‘O’ Level “Elementary” Mathematics (challenge)

* other syllabuses that involve whole numbers and Pythagorean triplets

* any precocious or independent learner who loves a challenge